Monthly Archives: January 2014

Atlantic City Zoning Board of Adjustment to hear 51 Unit Affordable Housing Site Plan

Public Notice:


 

CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC NOTICE OF HEARING
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that C&C Urban Renewal, LLC (the “Applicant”) has filed an application with the City of Atlantic City Zoning Board of Adjustment (the “Board”) for final site plan approval for the proposed development of a multifamily affordable residential rental community consisting of approximately fifty-one (51) dwelling units. The proposed development is located at Block 454, Lots 1.01-1.18 at Mediterranean, Tennessee, Drexel, and S. Carolina Avenues within the RM-2 Multi-Family Low Rise Zone in the City of Atlantic City (the “Property”).
Applicant obtained from the Board Use and Bulk Variance Relief and Preliminary Site Plan Approval for this proposal of 51 Affordable Rental Units on the Property, and for additional units on a nearby property located at Block 422, Lot 1.02, under Resolution #8 of 2013. Applicant now seeks Final Major Site Plan approval from the Board for these developments.
Any persons interested in this application will be given an opportunity to be heard at a public hearing of the Board scheduled for Thursday, January 23rd at 10:00 a.m. at Council Chambers, Room 206, City Hall, 1301 Bacharach Boulevard, Atlantic City, New Jersey. At such time, you may appear in person, by agent, or attorney, with respect to this application. All documents related to this application are on file with the Secretary of the Board located at 1301 Bacharach Boulevard, Room 508, City Hall, Atlantic City, New Jersey.
THIS NOTICE is provided in accordance with the direction of the municipal land use ordinance of the City of Atlantic City, and the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law.
Nicholas T. Menas, Esquire Fox Rothschild, LLP Attorneys for Applicant 1301 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 400 Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401 Tel. No. (609) 572-2236 Printer Fee: $33.66 #0090817944 Pub Date:January 13, 2014

 

Public Notice ID: 20956572.HTM
Tagged , ,

Garfield looks at First Ward for Redevelopment

Public Notice:


Planning Board CITY OF GARFIELD Resolution   Date: December 19, 2013  Submitted by:  Resolution: PB-  Seconded by:   WHEREAS, the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 et. seq., provides in pertinent part, that a local governing body may cause a preliminary investigation to be made as to whether an area is in need of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the City of Garfield adopted a Resolution on ______________, authorizing and directing the Planning Board to perform a preliminary investigation with respect to whether certain areas located within the First Ward of the City of Garfield, specifically Blocks 34.01, Lot 10; Block 27; Block 26; Block 25; Block 24.01; Block 24.02; Block 23; Block 22; Block 34.02; Block 31; Block 31.01; Block 9, Lots 1, 2 & 23; Block 10, 1 & 3; Block 11, Lots 1, 3, 5, 7 & 8; Block 12, Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 13; Block 14.01, Lot 47; Block 14.02, Lots 1, 4.01 7 4.02; Block 15, Lots 1, 3, 4, 51, 54; Block 16, Lots 1, 4 & 5 may be in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board by Resolution dated July 11, 2013 hired Burgis Associates, Inc., pursuant to RFP solicited by the Garfield Redevelopment Agency to study the aforementioned area; WHEREAS, on December 19, 2013, the Planning Board of the City of Garfield held a public hearing wherein the “Area in Need of Rehabilitation Investigation, First Ward Study Area, dated November 14, 2013, last revised December 16, 2013” prepared by Burgis Associates, Inc. was presented to the Board; WHEREAS, the Municipal Land Use Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55D – 26, authorizes the Planning Board to issue a report and recommendation to the governing body recommending that an area be designated as in need of redevelopment or rehabilitation. WHEREAS, after a public hearing held on December 19, 2013, the following initial findings of facts were made, to wit: 1. Donna Holmqvist, AICP, PP, of Burgis Associates, Inc. testified and presented the study entitled, “Area in Need of Rehabilitation Investigation, First Ward Study Area, dated November 14, 2013, last revised December 16, 2013”, which Study is made a part of the record herein. WHEREAS, as a result of this process, Ms. Holmqvist testified the Study shows that the area identified therein is in need of rehabilitation. WHEREAS, the Study was explained to the public and the public had an opportunity to comment, ask questions and be heard with regard to these issues and provide their input. WHEREAS, from the submissions made to the Planning Board, the testimony and evidence presented including the testimony and evidence of all interested parties and based upon the entire record, the following further findings of facts and conclusions of law were made: 1. All of the initial findings of facts as set forth in paragraph 1 through 3 and the “WHEREAS” paragraphs are hereby incorporated by reference herein as further findings of facts. 2. The Planning Board has determined that the area identified in the Study is in need of rehabilitation, 3. The Planning Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to recommend that the area depicted in the Study be declared an area in need of rehabilitation.  4. The Planning Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to adopt this Resolution and clearly state that this Resolution shall be, and hereby is, the report of the Planning Board as required by law, to the City Council and the Garfield Redevelopment Agency containing the Planning Board’s recommendation regarding the adoption of the Study and recommending that the area be declared an area in need of rehabilitation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Board of the City of Garfield that, based upon the foregoing findings of facts and conclusions of law, including all testimony and evidence presented at the hearing and based upon the reports submitted to the Planning Board, that it is hereby recommended to the City Council and Garfield Redevelopment Agency that it adopt the Study prepared by Burgis Associates, Inc., entitled, “Area in Need of Rehabilitation Investigation, First Ward Study Area, dated November 14, 2013, last revised December 16, 2013” as set forth herein and that this resolution shall be considered the report of the Planning Board to the City Council and Garfield Redevelopment Agency as required by law and that the Planning Board recommends that the area delineated in the Study be declared an area in need of rehabilitation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution will be published in the official newspapers of publication of the Planning Board of the City of Garfield.  SANTO T. ALAMPI Attorney/Secretary for the Planning Board City of Garfield Jan. 13, 2-014-Fee:$120.02(127) 3623657

 

Public Notice ID: 20958016.HTM
Tagged

Union Township Planning Board to determine whether Site is in Need of Redevelopment

Public Notice:


 

   TOWNSHIP OF UNION PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING  Notice is hereby given that the Union Township Planning Board will hold a public hearing on January 23, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Township Hall, 1976 Morris Avenue, Union, NJ, to determine whether property in the area described below is an area in need of redevelopment. Block 5009, Lot 1 in the Township of Union, NJ   Notice is hereby given that, as directed by the Union Township Committee, a redevelopment area determination shall not authorize the Township of Union to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire any property in the delineated area. All who are interested in or would be affected by a determination that the aforementioned property is within a redevelopment area are invited to attend and be heard. Take further notice that a report has been prepared entitled Redevelopment Study Area Determination of Need, Block 5009, Lot 1, which contains a map that shows the boundaries of the redevelopment area, including the property under investigation. The report (and map therein) can be inspected in the Office of the Planning Board, 1976 Morris Avenue, Union, New Jersey between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday. Diana Rutledge, Clerk Union Township Planning Board  1/6,13/2014 $127.60   
Tagged ,

Old Bridge Zoning Board of Adjustment to hear request for relief for surgi-center

Public Notice:

  TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE
LEGAL NOTICE TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that at its December 5, 2013 public hearing, the Old Bridge Township Zoning Board of Adjustment (“Board”) adopted a resolution memorializing the grant of relief described below to the undersigned in connection with the construction of an approximately 93,028 square foot, four story building with medical offices and medical facilities including a surgi-center, an inpatient surgical facility, and an imaging center on the Raritan Bay Medical Center Campus (“RBMC”) located at the intersection of Ferry Road and Route 18 and identified as Lots 28.11, 28.111, 28.12 and 28.112 in Block 17000 on the tax maps of the Township of Old Bridge (“the Premises”). The Board granted the following relief: 1. Amended Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Approval to, among other things, increase the elevation of portions of the site, add retaining walls, install a four foot tall chain link fence, install a guide rail, eliminate one drainage inlet, revise various inverts and/or grate elevations, add fill material, add house side shields to the light fixtures in the parking field, and other related site improvements; and Copies of the resolution, application and supporting documents are on file in the office of the Old Bridge Zoning Board of Adjustment at the Municipal Building, 1 Old Bridge Plaza, Old Bridge, New Jersey, 08857 and are available there for inspection Monday through Friday during normal business hours. Old Bridge Medical Office Building, LLC 839 Jefferson Street, Suite 600 Milwaukee, WI 53202 ($23.40) 959269  
Tagged , ,

Fort Lee hears 186 Residential 19 Story Building

Public Notice:

BOROUGH OF FORT LEE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING   PLEASE TAKE NOTICE the Fort Lee Board of Adjustment will hold a special meeting on Monday, January 13, 2014 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Fort Lee Municipal Building, 309 Main Street, Fort Lee, New Jersey.  The special meeting is being scheduled for the purpose of a continuation of hearing.  AGENDA Docket #26-13 Fort Lee EP, LLC  Fort Lee Executive Park One Executive Drive Block 6451, Lot 5.01 Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan-19-Story Residential Building, 186 Units  All documents are on file in the Office of Planning and Zoning, 309 Main Street, Fort Lee, NJ and may be viewed during regular business hours, 8:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. Any interested party may appear at said hearings and participate therein in accordance with the Rules of the Board of Adjustment.  Doug Sugarman, Chairman,  Board of Adjustment Barbara B. Klein, Planning Administrator January 9, 2014-fee:$32.13 (34) 3620987
Tagged , ,

Clayton Combined Planning & Zoning Board to hear 60,000 sf Industrial Application

Public Notice:


PUBLIC NOTICE    NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING  Combined Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment  Borough of Clayton, County of Gloucester    APPLICANT:   JOHN and BONNIE NIKITUK (H/W)      PROPERTY:  Block 1904, Lots 24.04 & 24.05, A/K/A 303 & 305 Cenco Blvd.         PURPOSE OF APPLICATION:  The Applicant has applied to the Combined Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Clayton (the “Board”) for a Use Variance, and Preliminary/Final Major Site   Plan approval, to construct a 60,000 sq. ft (+/-) building/facility, with related parking and loading areas, driveways, detention / retention basin, scale house, truck scale and related appurtenances, in order to operate a single stream recycling facility on the above referenced property. The property is located in the Borough’s Industrial (I) Zone District. The Applicant meets all area and bulk requirements in the (I) Zone District.  If deemed either necessary or appropriate, the applicant also requests any and all other variances, waivers or other forms of relief as may be required by the development code of the Borough of Clayton, the Municipal Land Use Law, or by direction of the Board.                        PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a public hearing will be held in the above referenced matter before the Combined Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Clayton at the Borough’s Municipal Building, 125 North Delsea Drive, Clayton, N.J. 08312 on Wednesday evening, February 26, 2014 at 7:30 P.M., time prevailing.  Copies of the application with attached exhibits, and all supporting documentation, are on file and available for inspection by the public in the Office of the Planning Board Secretary at the address set forth immediately above (856-881-2882 Ext. 123) during regular business hours or by appointment, holidays and weekends excluded.  Any interested person may appear at the hearing, give testimony, and otherwise participate in the review of this application, in accordance with the rules of the Combined Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Clayton, and the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law. You are not required to attend this hearing unless you object to the relief being requested.  You may attend the hearing and give testimony either in person or through your agent or attorney.      By Order of the Combined Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment  of the Borough of Clayton    Dale T. Taylor, Esquire  Attorney for the Applicant  95 North Main Street  Mullica Hill, New Jersey 08062  (856) 478-4500    Cost: $80.40(2670276) 1/10-1t

Public Notice ID: 20952089.HTM

Tagged , ,

Buena Vista repeals ordinances dealing with the Richland Village Redevelopment Area

Public Notice:


 

NOTICE FINAL PASSAGEBUENA VISTA TOWNSHIPCOUNTY OF ATLANTICNOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE FINAL PASSAGE ONORDINANCE NO. 8 – 2013 AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BUENA VISTA ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2013ORDINANCE NO. 8 – 2013ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 4 – 2006 AND ORDINANCE NO. 9 – 2006 OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BUENA VISTA Ordinance 8-2013 repeals Ordinance No. 4-2006 which adopted a Redevelopment Plan for the Richland Village Redevelopment Area in Buena Vista Township and Ordinance No. 9-2006 which amended Ordinance No. 4-2006, Richland Village Redevelopment Area, Exhibit D (matrix outlining recommended land use & area, and bulk regulations) pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1, et sec. Linda M. Gonzales, RMC Township Clerk DATED: DECEMBER 30, 2013 ptr fee $12.92 1644668
Tagged

Weehawken to Provide Tax Incentives for Hotel Development on Port Imperial South

Public Notice:


 TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND  AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A FINANCIAL AGREEMENT RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF A HOTEL ON BLOCK 64.01, LOT 3.02 IN FOR PORT IMPERIAL SOUTH  ORDINANCE #16-2013   WHEREAS, pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 et seq., the Township designated an approximately 23.518-acre portion of the planned development known as Port Imperial South, being delineated on the official Tax Map of the Township of Weehawken, Hudson County, New Jersey as Block 36.05, Lot 1.01 and Block 64.01, Lots 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 1.05, 1.06, 1.07, 3.02, and 3.03 (the “Redevelopment Area”), as an area in need of redevelopment and adopted a redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Area (“Redevelopment Plan”); and WHEREAS, XSS, L.L.C., a nationally prominent, experienced hotel developer, has proposed to develop and construct an approximately 221-room Renaissance Hotel and an approximately 154-room Residence Inn Extended Stay Hotel (the hotel uses, together, being referred to as the “Project”), consistent with the Redevelopment Plan, on Block 64.01, Lot 3.02 within the Redevelopment Area (the “Land”); and WHEREAS, under the Redevelopment Plan and the approvals for Port Imperial South, the Land is to be developed as a mixed use commercial facility including space for interior parking, retail uses, and ultimately hotel uses, and the parking and retail spaces having already been constructed, the current proposal by XSS, L.L.C. fulfills the Port Imperial South planned development and completes development of the Land as contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Project will be developed within air space defined and designated for hotel use in that certain Master Deed, as amended, creating and governing a commercial condominium regime with respect to the Land (the “Condominium);” and WHEREAS, XSS, L.L.C. will create an affiliated urban renewal entity pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:20-1 et seq. (“PILOT Law”) to develop the Project (the “Entity”), and the Entity will enter into a redevelopment agreement with the Township setting forth the terms and conditions under which the Entity agrees to develop the Project; and WHEREAS, the PILOT Law authorizes the Township to accept annual service charges or payments in lieu of regular property taxes (i.e., PILOTs) with respect to improvements made within an area in need of redevelopment and the Mayor and Council have determined that it is appropriate to do so for a term of fifteen (15) years with respect to the Project; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to the PILOT Law, the Mayor and Council have received and reviewed a certain application for a PILOT Agreement with respect to the Project improvements (the “Application”), including data on the Project and a proposed form of financial agreement, and finding that the Application satisfies the submission requirements of the PILOT Law and that the Project is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan, have adopted a Resolution approving the Application; and WHEREAS, the parties have discussed and negotiated the proposed form of financial agreement, a copy of which is dated November 25, 2013 and is on file with the Township Clerk, and the Mayor and Council have determined that it is appropriate to approve the execution of a financial agreement with the Entity substantially in the form on file with the Township Clerk; and  WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council make the following findings with respect to the relative benefits of the Project to the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area when compared to the costs, if any, associated with the tax exemption: a. The tax exemption will benefit the Township and its inhabitants by implementing the Redevelopment Plan and, thus, furthering the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area, which had been an unproductive and vacant property for many years. The Land had remained undeveloped until the recent construction of the parking and retail structure thereon. The development of a hotel in conjunction with the newly developed parking and retail improvements will complete the redevelopment of this formerly vacant and fallow area. b. The Township’s review and analysis indicate that the benefits of the Project outweigh any costs to the Township. c. The Project will contribute to the economic growth of existing local businesses and to the creation of new businesses which will cater to the residents of the Project and the other residents of the Township. d. The stabilization of the real estate taxes for the Project is a critical component to its developability and the Mayor and Council are satisfied that the PILOT Agreement is an important component of the Project. e. The proposed development will generate significant municipal revenues and new business activities to Weehawken, and will provide a facility that can accommodate events for up to 750 people which will be a positive feature for many Township residents who seek to take advantage of that opportunity. f. The availability of the tax exemption is important for attracting the required financing to the Project. The total project cost is estimated to be approximately $105,000,000. Without the PILOT Agreement, it would be difficult to attract the required construction and permanent financing that are needed to develop this project. g. It is expected that the Project will create approximately jobs during construction and 150 new permanent jobs. h. It is not anticipated that there will be any large or extraordinary municipal costs associated with the Project, since all of the municipal services and infrastructure necessary to support this development are currently in place and available.  WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council assess the importance of the financial agreement in obtaining development of the Project and influencing the locational decisions of probable occupants as follows: a. The relative stability and predictability of the service charges is considered to have been significant in attracting the interest of XSS, L.L.C., a nationally recognized hotel developer, in developing the Project at this location. It will allow the Entity to stabilize its expenses, which will insure the likelihood of the Project’s success and ensure that it will have a positive impact on the surrounding area. b. The Land is part of what was once a large rail transport facility. This 2.037 acre site has already undergone environmental remediation and the installation of basic improvements and infrastructure, the cost of which is shared by all units of the Condominium. The tax exemption will ameliorate these costs, which if not shared by the Project, would have made development of the Land economically unfeasible; and  WHEREAS, as recited above, the Entity to be created by XSS, L.L.C. will be entering into a redevelopment agreement pursuant to which it will assume the obligations associated with developing the Project, and therefore, this Ordinance is contingent upon the timely and satisfactory occurrence of the following: a. Creation of the Entity in compliance with the PILOT Law; and b. Execution of an appropriate redevelopment agreement; and  WHEREAS, because the Township owns a parking unit in the Condominium, with appurtenant rights pursuant to the Condominium documents and a certain Operating Agreement dated as of March 31, 2011, and because certain amendments to the Master Deed, Bylaws and Plans for the Condominium are anticipated, this Ordinance is further contingent upon the Township’s satisfactory review of (a) any amendments to the Condominium documents, and (b) the impact of the transfer of the Hotel Unit on the Township’s rights under the Operating Agreement, in order to confirm that the amendments and/or the transfer does not adversely affect the Township’s representation in the Condominium, the terms of the existing PILOT agreement or Operating Agreement, or the parking tax and other revenues generated by the existing parking uses.  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Township of Weehawken, County of Hudson and State of New Jersey as follows: Section 1. The findings set forth above are hereby adopted and made part of this Ordinance. Section 2. Pursuant to the authority granted under the PILOT Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:20-1 et seq., this Ordinance authorizes the execution of a financial agreement with the Entity with respect to the improvements constituting the Project, generally comprising an approximately 221-room Renaissance Hotel and an approximately 154-room Residence Inn Extended Stay Hotel, within the Condominum located on Block 64.01, Lot 3.02, as shown on the official tax maps of Weehawken Township. Section 3. The Mayor is authorized to execute the financial agreement in substantially the form dated November 25, 2013 and on file with the Township Clerk, upon the Entity’s demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the Township’s legal counsel, that it has been properly created under the laws of the State of New Jersey and subject to the satisfaction of the following additional conditions: a. Execution of an appropriate redevelopment agreement; and b. The Township’s satisfactory review of (a) any amendments to the Master Deed, Bylaws, or Plans for the Condominium, and (b) the economic impact of the transfer of the Hotel Unit on the Township’s rights under the Operating Agreement, in order to confirm that neither the amendments nor the transfer adversely affects the Township’s representation in the Condominium, the terms of the existing PILOT agreement and/or Operating Agreement, or the parking tax and other revenues generated by the existing parking uses. Section 4. The financial agreement herein authorized shall be subject to all requirements of the PILOT Law and all applicable federal, State and local laws and regulations on pollution control, worker safety, discrimination in employment, housing provision, zoning, planning and building code requirements.  The foregoing Ordinance was adopted for first reading by the Township Council of the Township of Weehawken, New Jersey, on November 25th , 2013 and ordered published, and will be further considered before final passage at a public hearing on January 8th 2014, at 7 p.m. at the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, 400 Park Avenue, Weehawken, New Jersey. A copy of this Ordinance has been posted on the bulletin board upon which public notices are customarily posted on in the Town Hall of the Town of Weehawken, and a copy (at no charge) is available up to and including the time of such meeting to the members of the public of the Town who shall request such copies, at the Office of the Town Clerk in said Town Hall in Weehawken, New Jersey.  Rola Dahboul Township Clerk  12/31/13 $184.33  

Tagged ,

Pompton Lakes to look at redevelopment of business district

Public Notice:


BOROUGH OF POMPTON LAKES Special Meeting  Wednesday, January 15, 2014 – 7:30pm   There will be a Special Meeting of the Pompton Lakes Mayor and Council which will be held on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 beginning at 7:30pm in the Municipal Building, 25 Lenox Avenue, Pompton Lakes, NJ. The purpose of the Meeting is to provide a presentation on Redevelopment in the Business District. Consistent with the New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act, the Meeting will be opened for public comments.  The Mayor and Council may conduct other business if deemed necessary at this Meeting. The Mayor and Council may adjourn into Closed Session if required for any pressing business that is recognized as an exception to the Open Public Meetings Act. Elizabeth Brandsness, RMC Municipal Clerk   Suburban Trends 3619999 Fee: $12.50 January 8, 2014

Tagged ,

Montvale to Consider K. Hovnanian Revised Development Application

Public Notice:


 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that K. Hovnanian North Jersey Acquisitions, L.L.C. (“Applicant”) has applied to the Planning Board of the Borough of Montvale for Preliminary and Final Major Subdivision and Preliminary and Final Site Plan approval with variances for property owned by Reno A. Del Ben identified on the Borough Tax Maps as Block 301, Lots 1 and 4, and Block 1002, Lot 7 lying between, and fronting upon, Summit Avenue and Upper Saddle River Road. (Also known as 32 and 49 Upper Saddle River Road and 127 Summit Avenue.) Such property lies in both the AH-6 Affordable Housing District and R-40 Single Family Residence District.  The Applicant is seeking approval of a revised development application in accordance with a Settlement Agreement, dated October 8, 2013 by and among the Applicant, Planning Board and the Borough of Montvale. The Settlement Agreement resolved a lawsuit filed by Applicant challenging the denial of preliminary site plan approval, related variances and preliminary and final subdivision approval, as set forth in a Resolution adopted by the Planning Board on October 4, 2011. In an Amended Order for Judgment issued by Judge Carver and filed on August 30, 2013 in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division- Bergen County, Docket No. BER-L-9574-11, the Settlement Agreement was remanded to the Planning Board for a “Whispering Woods” hearing, i.e., a hearing on the revised development plans consistent with the Settlement Agreement. Applicant proposes to reconfigure the three existing lots into proposed Lot 1 consisting of 16.87 +/- Acres in the AH-6 Zone and proposed Lot 7 consisting of 28.40+/- acres in the AH-6 and R-40 Single Family District. There is no change in the subdivision application. o; The revised development application reduces the townhome complex from 100 to 80 dwelling units on proposed Lot 1 which front upon and shall have its only access from Upper Saddle River Road. The type of townhome buildings around the periphery of the development facing Upper Saddle River Road (Buildings 3 & 4) and Serrell Drive (Buildings 1,2 & 9) has been changed from a 3 story stacked townhome building to a 2 story traditional townhome building. The townhome buildings have been moved 20+7- feet into the site and away from Upper Saddle River Road and Serrell Drive, respectively. The traditional townhomes have decks off the first residential floor and some have walk out basements. The foundations in the rear of the buildings are decorated and not left as exposed concrete. The buildings in the interior of the site continue to be 3 story stacked townhome buildings (Buildings 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 &11). The number of homes set aside for low and moderate income housing has been reduced from 20 to 6 and are located in stacked townhome Buildings 7 & 8.) The retaining wall along Serrell Drive have been reduced from 15+/- feet to 4.5+7- feet behind Building 1 and has been eliminated behind Buildings 2 & 9. In connection with the application, Applicant will seek variances, exceptions and waivers from the provision of the Borough’s Land Development Ordinances as may be applicable and to the extent necessary including but not limited to:  Minimum front yard setback from internal streets of 30 feet (Sec. 128-5.7D(2)(a)[2]) to allow a 25+/- setback for the traditional townhome buildings and 28.5+7- feet and 27.8+7- feet for stacked townhome Buildings 5 & 7;  Minimum side or rear yard setbacks of an undisturbed 75 foot setback/buffer area to an external property line where the property is adjacent to a zone other than an Affordable Housing Zone (Sec. 128-5.7D(2)(b) and 128-5.78(1)) to allow:   a 45+/- rear yard setback for buildings 10 & 11 in the rear of the property toward adjacent Lot 7 (which is part of the subdivision and will be deed restricted to create a 75′ setback/buffer to mitigate the variance);  the internal access road, parking area and Retaining Wall 4 which is 25.4S+/- feet from the westerly property line; and   the detention basin including access path which is 30+/- feet from the northern – property line of existing Lot 1;  Maximum Building Height of 2 stories (Sec. 128-5.7 D(2)(g)) to allow three stories for stacked townhome Buildings 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 & 11;  Maximum number of 8 units per building (Section 128-5.7 D(2)(h)[l]) to allow stacked townhome Buildings 5, 10 & 11 to have 10 units and stacked townhome Buildings 7 & 8 to have 11 units;  Construction on slopes with a pre disturbance topographic slope of 15% or greater (Section 128-6.3.1);  Maximum height of fences of 4 feet (Section 39-4) if and to the extent required for any retaining walls with fences on top of the retaining wall and 6 foot privacy fences between patios/decks;  Percentage of Affordable Housing Units of less than 20% of the total number of homes if and to the extent required; Applicant will seek any and all variances, exceptions or waivers or other relief as may be require by revisions to the plans during the public hearing process or otherwise. Applicant is also seeking approval of a Soil Moving Permit. The Application has been scheduled for public hearing on Monday, January 13, 2013 at the Municipal Building, 12 Mercedes Drive, Montvale, New Jersey at 7:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be reached. Any interested party may appear at the hearing in person or by counsel and will be permitted to question witnesses, offer testimony or otherwise participate in the hearing. The plans, application and supporting documents, including the Settlement Agreement, dated October 8, 2013, are on file and may be inspected at the Planning Board offices, 12 Mercedes Drive, Montvale, New Jersey during regular business hours. Francine Chester, Esq. Attorney for Applicant K. Hovnanian North Jersey Acquisitions, L.L.C 110 Fieldcrest Avenue Edison, N.J. 08837 732-623-6819  January 1, 2013-Fee: $155.92 (166) 3618571
Tagged , ,