Monthly Archives: October 2013

Borough of Raritan invites bidders to rehab properties

BOROUGH OF RARITAN INVITATION TO BIDDERS RARITAN HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Notice of Reschedule NOTICE TO BIDDERS is hereby given that sealed bids are invited and will be accepted as set forth herein for rehabilitation of the residential properties listed below. The bid opening scheduled for Monday, October 7th has been cancelled and rescheduled as listed herein. BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED at the Raritan Municipal Building located at 22 First Street, Raritan NJ 08869 in Council Chambers. Bids must be received at the municipal building no later than 1 PM on Thursday, October 24, 2013. Any bids received after the date and time set forth above will be rejected. No facsimile copies or emailed bids will be accepted. Any questions regarding the bid should be directed to Affordable Housing Administrators at 732-892-4292. BIDS MUST BE SUBMITTED on the Bid Proposal form included in the Bid Package. Bids must be submitted in separate sealed envelopes for each project with the name of the homeowner and the name of the bidding contractor clearly indicated on each envelope. BID PROPOSAL PACKAGES may be obtained by calling the Affordable Housing Administrators at 732-892-4292. BIDDERS MUST COMPLY with P.L. 1975, C.127 regarding Affirmative Action Regulations, and P.L. 1977, C.33 regarding Disclosure of Corporate and/or Partnership Ownership. Bidders must present a valid State of NJ Business Registration Certificate and Federal ID number and Insurance Certificate at time of bid. THE BID OPENING is scheduled for 1:00 PM on October 24, 2013 at the Raritan Municipal Building in the Council Chambers. We reserve the right to reject any and all bids, or to waive any informality in the bids and accompanying documents received if deemed in the best interest of the property owner. AHA hereby reserves the right to consider the bids for sixty (60) days after the receipt thereof. 1. 12 Cardinal Way 2. 49 Quick Avenue Raritan, NJ 08669 Raritan, NJ 08869 BY ORDER OF the Raritan Borough Council Daniel Jaxel, Borough Administrator and Karin Kneafsey, QPA ($36.52) 873436

 

Woodbury Heights adds Affordable Housing Zone

Public Notice:


>  PUBLIC NOTICE    ORDINANCE 15 – 2013    ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP FOR THE BOROUGH OF WOODBURY HEIGHTS, GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY    WHEREAS, by the Borough Council of the Borough of Woodbury Heights, County of Gloucester and State of New Jersey (“the Borough”) has proposed a revised Housing Element and Fair Share Plan Amendment to the Master Plan; and    WHEREAS, the Borough Council has deemed it in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare to implement the aforesaid Amendment to the Master Plan: and    WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the consistency of the Woodbury Heights Master Plan with the Land Use Code and Ordinances of the Borough of Woodbury Heights, the Borough Council desires to codify and implement the recommendations contained in the aforesaid Housing Element and Fair Share Plan Amendment; and    WHEREAS, to further implement the Amended Housing Element and Fair Share Plan, the Borough intends to hereby establish a new Zoning District entitled “Residential Multifamily Affordable District (RM-2)” and to further supplement and amend the Zoning Ordinance as follows:    A. Create a new Section 70-13.3 under Article IV, District Regulations as follows:    1.  Section 70-13.3 Residential Multifamily Affordable (RM-2)    A. The purpose of the RM-2 District is to provide for the construction   of supportive housing for persons of low and moderate income   consistent with New Jersey’s Fair Housing Act, N.J.S.A. 52:27D-301   et seq., the rules of the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing   and the Mount Laurel Doctrine.    B. Permitted Principal Uses.    1.   All principal permitted uses in the Residential – R district  under Section 70-13A.    2.  Supportive Housing in single-family, semi-detached or   quadruplex dwelling units.    C.   Accessory Uses Permitted.  All accessory uses permitted in the R   District under Section 70-13B.    D.   A maximum density of 13 units per acre.    E.   Maximum Building Height in accordance with Section 70-13C.    F. Area and Yard Requirements.    1.    For all uses as permitted in the R-District the area and   yard requirements of Section 70-13D, apply.    2.  Supportive Housing Single-family units in accordance with   the following:            Minimum Lot Area:              5,000 square feet          Minimum Lot Width:      50 feet          Minimum Lot Depth:    100 feet          Minimum Side Yard Setback: 10 feet          Minimum Front Yard Setback:  25 feet          Minimum Rear Yard Setback:  25 feet    3. Supportive Housing Semi-Detached single-family units in  accordance with the following:            Minimum Lot Area:                        3,750 square feet          Minimum Lot Width:                        37 feet          Minimum Lot Depth:                        100 feet          Minimum Side Yard Setback:         0-feet and 10-feet          Minimum Front Yard Setback:        25 feet          Minimum Rear Yard Setback:        25 feet    4.  Supportive Housing Quadruplex Swelling Units in   accordance with the following:    Minimum Lot Area:                  10,000 square feet  Minimum Lot Width at Building Line:  100 feet  Minimum Lot Depth:        150 feet  Minimum Side Yard Setback: 15-feet with an   aggregated of 25-feet  Minimum Front Yard Setback:        30 feet  Minimum Rear Yard Setback:        30 feet            G.   Design Criteria.    1.   If parking is proposed in the front yard for the duplex units,   the front yard setback shall be increased to accommodate  all spaces on-site.    2.  Parking for the quadruplex units shall be provided in the   rear yard area.  The total number of spaces shall meet the   Residential Site Improvement Standards.  All parking areas  shall be screened from adjoining properties.    3.  Street/Shade trees shall be provided for each residential   unit with a minimum spacing of one tree for every 50-feet   of lot width.    4.  Landscaping plans shall be provided including foundation   plantings.  Perimeter plantings/fencing shall be provided   adjacent to existing single-family dwelling units.    BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the Zoning Map for the Borough of Woodbury Heights is hereby amended to designate that land and premises known as Block 91, Lot 6 of the Official Tax Maps as within the Residential Multifamily Affordable (RM-2) District, thereby repealing its former District Designation;    BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, as follows:    1.  Repealer.  Any and all other Ordinances or parts of Ordinances inconsistent with the terms of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such inconsistency.      2.  Saved from Repeal.   Any and all other Ordinances or parts of Ordinances not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of this Ordinance are hereby saved from repeal.            3.  Filing.  Upon adoption, a copy of this Ordinance shall be forthwit

Fort Lee to introduce a change to Affordable Housing Development Fees

BOROUGH OF FORT LEE NOTICE OF INTRODUCTION    Notice is hereby given that the following Ordinance #2013-26 was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Fort Lee on Thursday, October 10, 2013, and passed on first reading, and the same was then ordered to be published in full or in summary according to law; and that such Ordinance will be further considered for final passage at a meeting of the Mayor and Council to be held at the Memorial Municipal Building, 309 Main Street, Fort Lee, New Jersey on Thursday, November 14, 2013, commencing at 7:00 p.m., at which time and place, or any time and place to which such meeting shall from time to time be adjourned, all persons interested will be given opportunity to be heard concerning such Ordinance.  By order of the Mayor and Council.  Neil Grant, RMC Municipal Clerk Date: October 11, 2013  BOROUGH OF FORT LEE ORDINANCE #2013-26   AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 261, LAND USE PROCEDURES, ARTICLE VII, AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FEES OF THE CODE OF THE BOROUGH OF FORT LEE  BE IT ORDAINED, by the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Fort Lee, County of Bergen and State of New Jersey, that Chapter 261, Land Use Procedures, Article VII, Affordable Housing Development Fees of the Code of the Borough of Fort Lee, is hereby amended as follows:  Section 1. That Borough Ordinance ? 261-50, Eligible exaction, ineligible exaction and exemptions, shall be amended and supplemented and hence forth provide as follows:  A. Eligible exactions, ineligible exactions and exemptions for residential development. (1) Affordable housing developments, developments where the developer is providing for the construction of affordable units elsewhere in the municipality, and developments where the developer has made a payment in lieu of on-site construction of affordable units shall be exempt from development fees.
(2) Developments that have received preliminary or final site plan approval prior to the adoption of this amended article shall be required to pay development fees calculated based on the development fee ordinance in effect prior to the adoption of this amended article, unless the developer seeks a substantial change in the approval. Where a site plan approval does not apply, a zoning and/or building permit shall be synonymous with preliminary or final site plan approval for this purpose. The fee percentage shall be vested on the date that the building permit is issued.
(3) Development fees shall be imposed and collected when an existing structure undergoes a change to a more intense use, is demolished and replaced, or is expanded, if the expansion is not otherwise exempt from the development fee requirement. The development fee shall be calculated on the increase in the equalized assessed value of the improved structure.
(4) Owner-occupied residential structures demolished and replaced as a result of a fire, flood, or natural disaster shall be exempt from paying a development fee.
(5) Owner-developers of (i) newly-constructed one or two family owner-occupied dwelling units; or (ii) reconstructed one or two family owner-occupied dwelling units; or (iii) additions to one or two family owner-occupied dwelling units (but maintaining such units as one or two family owner-occupied dwelling units), shall all be exempt from paying a development fee.
B. Eligible exactions, ineligible exactions and exemptions for non-residential development (1) The non-residential portion of a mixed-use inclusionary or market rate development shall be subject to the two and a half percent (2.5%) development fee, unless otherwise exempted below.
(2) The two and a half percent (2.5%) fee shall apply to an increase in equalized assessed value resulting from additions to existing structures to be used for non-residential purposes.
(3) Non-residential developments shall be exempt from the payment of non-residential development fees in accordance with the exemptions required pursuant to P.L.2008, c.46, as specified in the Form N-RDF “State of New Jersey Non-Residential Development Certification/Exemption” Form. Any exemption claimed by a developer shall be substantiated by that developer.
(4) A developer of a non-residential development exempted from the non-residential development fee pursuant to P.L.2008, c.46 shall be subject to it at such time the basis for the exemption no longer applies, and shall make the payment of the non-residential development fee, in that event, within three years after that event or after the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy of the non-residential development, whichever is later.
(5) If a property which was exempted from the collection of a non-residential development fee thereafter ceases to be exempt from property taxation, the owner of the property shall remit the fees required pursuant to this section within 45 days of the termination of the property tax exemption. Unpaid non-residential development fees under these circumstances may be enforceable by the Borough of Fort Lee as a lien against the real property of the owner.
Section 2. Any ordinance or part thereof inconsistent with this ordinance is repealed to the extent of such inconsistency.  Section 3. The exemptions from payment of residential development fees contained in this ordinance shall apply to and be effective for all developments which are the subject of applications for development, and applications for certificates of occupancy, pending at the time this ordinance is adopted. This ordinance shall take effect following adoption and approval in a time and manner provided by law.   ATTEST: BOROUGH OF FORT LEE  Neil Grant Mark J. Sokolich, Mayor Borough Clerk October 15, 2013 Fee:$164.43(174)3577628

 

Public Notice ID: 20699915.HTM

Sunnyside Senior Housing wins a Mt. Laurel II suit in Westfield

WESTFIELD

SUPERIOR COURT
OF NEW JERSEY
LAW DIVISION –
UNION COUNTY
DOCKET NUMBER
UNN-L-135-09
Civil Action
(Mount Laurel II)
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
OF FAIRNESS AND
REASONABLENESS OF
SETTLEMENT
STICKEL, KOENIG, SULLIVAN & DRILL
571 Pompton Avenue
Cedar Grove, New Jersey 07009
Ph 973-239-8800 Fx 973-239-0369
Email: SKSIaw@aol.com; jondrill@aol.com
Attorneys for Defendants Town of Westfield,
Andrew Skibitsky, and Town Council of the
Town of Westfield SUNNYSIDE SENIOR HOUSING OF WESTFIELD, L.L.C.,
PIaintiff,
vs.
TOWN OF WESTFIELD, ANDREW SKIBITSKY (Mayor of the Town of Westfield), TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF WESTFIELD and PLANNING BOARD OF
THE TOWN OF WESTFIELD
Defendants.
This matter having been jointly opened to the court by: Stickel, Koenig, Sullivan & Drill (Jonathan E. Drill, Esq., appearing) and Dentons US LLP (Robert W. Cockren, Esq., appearing), attorneys for
defenfants Town of Westfield, Mayor Andrew Skibitsky, and Town Council; Lindabury, McCormick, Estabrook & Cooper (Kenneth Soriero, Esq., appearing) , attorneys for the Planning Board. of the Town of Westfield; R. Marcel Pirtea, Esq., attorney for plaintiff; and Adam M. Gordon, Esq., staff attorney with Fair Share Housing Center, a public interest organization representing, the housing rights of New Jersey’ s poor ; and the aforementioned parties having signed a Settlement Agreement dated December 11, 2012 (the “Settlement Agreement”) settling Mount Laurel II
litigation, which Settlement Agreement in paragraph 1 provides that the Settlement Agreement is contingent upon the Superior Court, Law Division (the *Court”) (1) approving the Settlement Agreement after a “Fairness Hearing” conducted pursuant to East / West Venture v. Borough of Fort Lee, 286 N. J. Super. 311 (App. Div. 1996) , and (2) granting a Declaratory Judgment of Compliance and Repose pursuant to N.J.S.A.
52:27D-313 (a) after a “Compliance Hearing” (the Fairness Hearing and Compliance Hearing: together referred to as the “hearing”) ; and East /
West Venture / supra, at 326 , holding that Mount Laurel litigation may be settled only after a finding by the Court that : (1) the settlement has apparent merit, (2) notice has been given to all members of the class and others who have an interest in the settlement, (3) a hearing has been conducted on the settlement where those affected have sufficient time to prepare ; and ( 4 ) the settlement is “fair and reasonable to members of the protected class”; and the Court, having determined for the reasons set forth on the record on January 23, 2013 that the Settlement Agreement had apparent merit, entered an Order of Remand and Scheduling of a Fairness and Compliance Hearing on January 23, 2013 (the “Remand Order”) , with the hearing being scheduled for June 10, 2013, and the Remand Order required Defendant Town af Westfield (the “Town”) to provide notice of the hearing to various specified parties at least 30 days prior to June 10, 2013 and that the notice be in the form approved by the Court and attached to the Remand Order; and the required notice having been provided to all required parties within the time ordered by the Court; and the Court having duly conducted the hearing on June 10, 2013; and the Court having found upon the conclusion of the hearing for the reasons set forth on the record on September 9, 2013 that all criteria set forth in East / West Venture have been satisfied; and the Court having further found for the reasons set forth on the record on September 9, 2013 that the Town’s Compliance Plan, consisting of its 2013 Housing Plan Element. and Fair Share Plan (the ”2013 HPE&FSP”) along with various attachments as well as various implementing ordinances ( all such documents together referred to as the ”2013 Compliance PIan” ) , all of which 2013 Compliance Plan documents were entered into evidence during the hearing as exhibits, create the realistic opportunity to achieve the Town’s affordable housing
obligation under Mount Laurel II; and the Court determining to settle an issue that has arisen regarding payment of the fees of the Court appointed Special Master; and the Court determining to enter a separate Declaratory Judgment of Fairness and Reasonableness of the Settlement with a provision for the payment of the Special Master’ s fees ; and the Court determining to enter a separate Declaratory Judgment of Compliance and Repose; and the within order being the Declaratory Judgment of Fairness and Reasonableness;
IT IS THEREFORE ON THIS 7TH OF OCTOBER, 2013, ADJUDGED , DECLARED
AND ORDERED AS FOLLOW:
1. The Court hereby declares that the Settlement Agreement is approved as reasonable and fair to the interests of low and moderate income households as to the Sunnyside site as well as all other aspects of the Settlement Agreement.
2. The Court specifically declares that the Sunnyside site is available / approvable, developable and suitable to produce affordable housing from a Mount Laurel perspective in accordance with N.J.A.C.
5:97-3.13, which the Court determines it should follow in accordance with Hills Development Co. v. Bernards Township, 103 N.J. 1, 63 (1986)
(courts “should conform wherever possible to the decisions, criteria, and guidelines” adopted by COAH) .
3. The Court also specifically declares that the proposed 16% affordable housing set aside for the Sunnyside site is fair and reasonable as the affordable housing will be rental units (4 units of the 24 units proposed on the site will be set aside for affordable rental housing) .
4. Plaintiff and the Town shall pay the Court appointed Special Master’s firm (Clarke Caton Hintz) Invoice Number 56818 dated. June 12, 2013 within 30 days of the entry of the within Judgment in accordance with the terms of the Court’s March 26, 2012 Order appointing the Special Master as follows: Plaintiff shall pay $9,999.88 and the Town shall pay $5,617.04. Any further costs and fees which the Special Master may charge in this matter shall be paid by the Town exclusively within 30 days of receipt of the Special Master’s invoice(s).
5, The Court shall retain jurisdiction so as to ensure the implementation of of the within Judgment. Notwithstanding
the retention of jurisdiction, the within Judgment is hereby declared to be a final judgment.
/s/ Frederic S. Kessler,
P.J.Ch.
($107.80) 875743

Township of Branchburg is looking for a Historic Preservation Professional

TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG Request for Qualifications The Township of Branchburg is soliciting proposals through a fair and open process in accordance with N.J.S.A 19:44A-20.4 et seq. for Historic Preservation Professional service The Applicant will designate a specific individual(s) to work with the Township of Branchburg and provide resumes for both the individual and Principals of the Business Entity. Sealed RFQ responses will be received by the Purchasing Agent on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at 10:00 A.M. local prevailing time in the Court Room at the Municipal Building, 1077 U.S. Highway 202 North, Branchburg, NJ 08876-3936, at which time and place responses will be opened. Qualification documents, Scope of Work, and instructions to applicants may be obtained via the Township Website: www.branchburg.nj.us. It is the bidder’s responsibility to check the website regularly for possible addenda Proposals shall be submitted in duplicate, one copy on the proposal forms contained in the bid package and one copy scanned as a PDF file and submitted on a CD. Proposals shall be in a sealed envelope, bearing the name and address of the bidder and the name of the project. This information shall be on the outside of the envelope and addressed to the Purchasing Agent. In the following format: RFQ #: Q02-2013 RFP Title: Historic Preservation Professional If the bid is sent by overnight or express mail, the above designation SHALL also appear on the outside of the courier company envelope. Any proposal received not complying with these requirements SHALL not be opened and returned to sender marked “Unresponsive”. Applicants shall comply with the requirements of P.L. 1975, C127, and N.J.A.C. 17:27et seq. John A Gregory, Jr., Purchasing Agent/Assistant Administrator ($32.12) 873446

 

Lakewood Township MUA is soliciting engineering services on an “as needed” basis

TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD

Request for Qualification (RFQ)
For Engineering Consultant Services On An As-Needed Basis
To Perform Engineering Services
The Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities Authority (Authority) is soliciting proposals for “Engineering Consultant Services On An As-Needed Basis To Perform Engineering Services” through the Fair and Open Contracting Process, in accordance with the New Jersey Local Unit “Pay to Play” Law, N.J.S.A. 19:44A-20.4 et seq. and Chapter 271, P.L. 2005.
Sealed qualification packages will be received by the Authority, on November 14, 2013 at 11:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time (EST).
Date RFQ packages are available: October 10, 2013
Submission due Date and Time: November 14, 2013
11:00 A.M. EST
Place of Delivery: Lakewood Township Municipal
Utilities Authority
390 New Hampshire Avenue
Lakewood, NJ 08701
Contact Number: (732) 363-4422 ext.1
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) packages may be obtained on the Internet at http://www.lakewoodmua.com or in person from the Engineering Department, during the hours of 9:00 AM – 4:00 PM any day the Authority is open.
All RFQ responses (an original qualification package and one (1) copy) shall be submitted in a sealed envelope addressed to – The Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities Authority, 390 New Hampshire Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701, with the envelope clearly marked – “RFQ For Engineering Consultant Services On An As-Needed Basis To Perform Engineering Services.”
The Authority reserves the right to reject any or all qualification packages or parts thereof.
The authority further reserves the right to waive technicalities and formalities in the RFQ where deemed advisable in protection of the best interest of the Authority.
The Authority reserves the right to investigate any or all qualification claims made by any or all consultants prior to inviting those consultants to submit a proposal.
The Authority reserves the right to interpret all qualification packages and waive any ambiguities therein for the best interest of the Authority.
All awards are subject to approval by the commissioners of the Authority and the Authority’s attorney
($69.00) 875725

West New York to vote on tax exemption for 422-426 21st Street

TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK County of Hudson  ORDINANCE #21/13   AN ORDIANCE APPROVING A FIVE (5) YEAR TAX EXEMPTION FOR Three (3) STORY MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING CONSTRUCTED BY 422-426 61st Street LLC PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FIVE (5) YEAR EXEMPTION AND ABATEMENT LAW, N.J.S.A. 40-A:21-1 ET. SEQ. AND SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE 11/07 AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED FIVE YEAR TAX ABATEMENT ORDINANCE   WHEREAS, 422-426 61st Street LLC, (the “Entity”) owns certain property known as Block 51, Lot 2, (the “Property”) on the Official Tax map of the Town of West New York (the “Town”); and  WHEREAS, the Property is located in the Town, and in an area previously found to be in need of redevelopment; and  WHEREAS, the Entity has filed an application (“Application”) for a tax exemption for one (1) project involving the construction of a three (3) story, multi-family building containing 15 residential units, to be offered for rent; and  WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to adopt an ordinance to utilize tax exemptions/ abatements pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40-A:21-1 et. seq., the Five (5) Year Exemption and Abatement Law; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40-A:21-1 et seq., the Town adopted Ordinance 11/07, an Ordinance entitled Five Year Tax Abatement Ordinance (“the Ordinance”) to allow Five (5) Year Tax exemptions which allows the town to enter into a tax agreement with the applicant for the exemption and abatement of local real estate property taxes and the payment of an amount in lieu of full property taxes;  WHEREAS, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40-A:21-1 et seq., and Section 7 of the Ordinance, a tax exemption for new construction of multiple dwellings is permissible; and  WHEREAS, under the five-year tax exemption, the Entity is required to pay the Town (in addition to the full taxes on the land, which shall continue to be conventionally assessed and taxed) a payment in lieu of taxes for the new improvements on the Property; and  WHEREAS, the application for tax exemption was complete and timely filed; and  WHEREAS, the Property in 2013 generated approximately $13,867.00 in taxes; and  WHEREAS, the Town’s assessor and its Abatement Consultant have reviewed the application and determined that its contents satisfy the requirements of N.J.S.A. 40A:21-1 et. seq. and Ordinance 11/07; and  WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has determined that the proposed Project Improvements are eligible for tax exemption pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:21-9 and the Ordinance; and  WHEREAS, under the five-year tax exemption, the Entity is required to pay the Town (in addition to the full taxes on the land, which shall continue to be conventionally assessed and taxed) payment in lieu of taxes for the new improvements on the Property, based on an estimated tax otherwise due on the improvements on the completed project of $76,706. as follows:  (a) In the first full year following substantial completion, no payment on the new improvements; (b) In the second full year following completion, an amount equal to 20% of taxes otherwise due on the new improvements, estimated to be $12,050; (c) In the third full year of following completion, an amount equal to 40% of taxes otherwise due on the new improvements, estimated to be $24,100; (d) In the fourth full year following completion, an amount equal to 60% of taxes otherwise due on the new improvements, estimated to be $36,150; (e) In the fifth full year following completion, an amount equal to 80% of taxes otherwise due on the improvements, estimated to be $48,200; and   WHEREAS, upon the expiration of the tax exemption, it is estimated that the Project Improvements for each separate project in total will generate a tax payment of approximately $76,600. based on the current tax rate; and  NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Major and Board of Commissioners of the Town of West New York, County of Hudson, State of New Jersey as follows:  1. The above recital is incorporated as if fully set forth at length herein. 2. The Application for a five (5) year tax exemption for the full and true value of the Project Improvements for each separate project is hereby approved. 3. The Major or Municipal administrator is hereby authorized to execute a five-year tax exemption agreement (“Tax Agreement”) for each separate project which shall contain, at a minimum, the following terms and conditions:  (a) The payment in lieu of taxes on the Project Improvements shall in total be:  (i)Year 1: the tax year following substantial completion, no payment in lieu of taxes otherwise due. (ii) Year 2: the second tax year, 20% taxes otherwise due, estimated to be $12,050; (iii) Year 3: the third tax year, 40% of taxes otherwise due, estimated to be $24,100; (iv)Year 4: the fourth tax year, 60% of taxes otherwise due, estimated to be $36,150; (v) Year 5: the fifth tax year, 80% of taxes otherwise due, estimated to be $48,200;  4. The taxes otherwise due for the Project Improvements shall be determined as of the date of completion by the municipal Tax Assessor. 5. The Tax Agreements for each project shall take effect for each project immediately following the completion and occupancy of such project and shall have a duration of five years unless terminated prior thereto. 6. With respect to the transfer of the property, where it is determined that the new owner of the property will continue to use the property pursuant to the conditions which qualified the property, no tax shall be due, the exemption shall continue and the agreement shall remain in effect; and 7. At the termination of each Tax Agreement, the new improvements shall be subject to all applicable real estate property taxes as provided by State law and regulation and local ordinance; but nothing herein shall prohibit a project, at the termination of an agreement, from qualifying for, and the receiving the full benefits of, any other tax preferences provided by law. 8. The Municipal Clerk shall forward a copy of the Tax Agreements to the Director of the Division of Local Government Services in the Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the date of execution of each separate Tax Agreement. 9. The Tax Agreements shall be subject to the provisions of Section 11 of the Ordinance, as may be applicable. 10. All ordinances and parts of ordinances inconsistent herewith, excepting the Ordinance, are hereby repealed. 11. This ordinance shall take effect at the time and in the manner provided by law.  Introduced: 8/21/13 Re-Introduced: 9/27/13   Notice   The foregoing Ordinance was adopted for first reading by the Mayor and Board of Commissioners of the Town of West New York, New Jersey, on August 21, 2013 and was tabled and carried and ordered published for re-introduction on September 27, 2013, at which time this Ordinance was further ordered to be published and will be further considered before final passage at a public hearing on November 20, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the Commission Chambers, Municipal Building, West New York, NJ. A copy of this Ordinance has been posted on the bulletin board upon which public notices are customarily posted on in the Town Hall of the Town of West New York, and a copy (at no charge) is available up to and including the time of such meeting to the members of the public of the Town who shall request such copies, at the Office of the Town Clerk in said Town Hall in West New York, N.J.  Carmela Riccie, RMC Town Clerk  10/15/13 $154.24

Mercer County and the Township of Ewing to hold public meeting to review transportation alternatives for the Parkway Avenue Redevelopment Area

Mercer County and the Township of Ewing will hold a public meeting to review transportation access alternatives for the Parkway Avenue Redevelopment Area. The meeting will be held at the West Trenton Volunteer Fire Company ballroom, 40 W Upper Ferry Rd, Ewing Township, NJ 08628, on Monday, October 28, 2013, 7:00 – 9:00 PM. For more information, contact the Mercer County Planning Division at 609-989-6545

Bayonne to consider redevelopment area

PLANNING BOARD  OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE,   NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday, October 16, 2013, at 6:00 p.m. at the Dorothy E. Harrington Council Chamber at City Hall, 630 Avenue C, Bayonne, New Jersey 07002, the Planning Board of the City of Bayonne will hold a public hearing to investigate and determine whether the study area hereinafter described meets the criteria for an area in need of redevelopment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5 and consider a redevelopment plan for such area. The purpose of the investigation is to determine if the hereinafter described study area complies with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5 to be designated as an area in need of redevelopment.  The study area that the City Council requested the Planning Board to consider is comprised of the property commonly known as Block 451; Lots 1.01 and 1.02; 43-75 Mechanic St.: Block 451; Lots 2.03, 2.04 and 2.05; and Northwest of Rt. 440, between E. 22nd St. and E. 25th St.: Block 452.02; Lots 3-9 & 11 on the tax map of the City of Bayonne.   PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that you are privileged to be present at said public hearing to present any and all objections or support you may have and any other general comments relative to the Planning Board’s investigation as to whether such area should be designated an area in need of redevelopment. The resolution of the City Council authorizing and directing the Planning Board to undertake this investigation, the area in need of redevelopment investigation report prepared by Clark Caton Hintz, and a map depicting the boundaries of the area and the location of the various parcels of property included in the study area are on file with the City Clerk and the Planning Board and all such documents are available for inspection during normal business hours.  PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, after the review by the Planning Board at the hearing described herein, a finding by the City Council that the above-described area, or a portion thereof, constitutes an area in need of redevelopment operates as a finding of public purpose and authorizes the City to acquire the properties contained in said area, with or without the consent of the owner, including through exercise of the City’s power of eminent domain. If property owned by you is designated as part of an area in need of redevelopment and you wish to challenge such designation, you must take legal action to do so within a presumptive time period of 45 days after the City Council’s action adopting such designation. CITY OF BAYONNE PLANNING BOARD. Hudson County NJ

Maplewood Economic Development Subcommittee to meet with potential redevelopers for the Maplewood Post Office Site

PUBLIC NOTICE  October 3, 2013 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Economic Development Sub-Committee of the Maplewood Township Committee will meet in Closed Session at the Maplewood  Memorial (Main) Library, 51 Baker Street, Maplewood, New Jersey on the following  date and time: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 at 3:15 P.M. The purpose of the meeting is to meet with potential developers for the  Maplewood Post Office Redevelopment Plan. ELIZABETH J. FRITZEN, R.M.C., C.M.C., C.M.R. Township Clerk 10/7/2013 $29.00