Counties

Borough of Hampton Hopes to Settle Mt. Laurel Issue

Posted in: Hunterdon County NJ by | No Comments Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Public Notice:


HUNTERDON COUNTY JACOB HABERMAN, Plaintiff, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF HAMPTON, THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF HAMPTON, and THE MAYOR OF THE BOROUGH OF HAMPTON, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, HUNTERDON COUNTY (MOUNT LAUREL II) DOCKET NO. L-6527-81 Civil Action NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO: All Interested Persons A hearing will be held on May 29, 2015 at 10 a.m. before the Honorable Peter A. Buchsbaum, J.S.C. (retired, on recall) in the Hunterdon County Justice Complex, 65 Park Avenue, Flemington, New Jersey 08822, to consider the entry of a Final Judgment of Compliance in favor of Hampton Borough based upon a proposed Litigation Settlement Agreement which has been submitted to the Court. Entry of a Final Judgment of Compliance would declare Hampton Borough in compliance with its obligations to provide realistic opportunities for housing affordable to low and moderate income households under Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Mt. Laurel Township. Entry of a Judgment of Compliance may bar, for six years, any claim that Hampton Borough is failing to provide sufficient realistic housing opportunities for low and moderate income households. In the pending cross-motion filed by Jacob Haberman, Mr. Haberman has requested modification of Hampton Borough’s 11/18/91 Final Judgment on Compliance to allow development permitted under the 1991 Judgment to be constructed on the north lot (Block 23, Lot 1) of Mr. Haberman’s property, to allow an on-site setaside in lieu of a financial contribution for housing rehabilitation and to allow construction of necessary infrastructure in lieu of the financial contributions for infrastructure improvements called for under the 1991 Judgment. Mr. Haberman claims that these modifications will provide adequate realistic opportunities for housing affordable to low and moderate income households to meet the needs of persons residing in Hampton Borough and to meet the needs of Hampton Borough’s fair share of present and prospective regional housing need. Hampton Borough has denied these claims. The parties have agreed to settle the case upon the following terms: 1. Hampton Borough has an obligation between now and 2024 to create realistic opportunities for 27 units of safe, decent housing affordable to low and moderate income households. 2. The Borough will maintain the present AH-Affordable Housing Zone designation of the north lot (Block 23, Lot 1) and the south lot (Block 24, Lot 2) owned by Plaintiff Jacob Haberman for an inclusionary development. The inclusionary development shall consist of 333 dwelling units, all of which shall be constructed on the north lot. The 333 units will include 300 market-rate units and 33 units to be affordable and deed-restricted for occupancy by low and moderate income households. None of the dwelling units may be rental units except that some or all of the 33 low and moderate income units may be in the form of group homes for developmentally disabled persons. 3. Pursuant to Schedule A attached to the proposed Litigation Settlement Agreement, the present AH zoning shall be amended to permit the development of 333 dwelling units on Mr. Haberman’s north lot at a gross density not exceeding 2.4 dwellings per acre. The amended AH zoning shall also permit 6,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses. The area and bulk requirements for the permitted dwelling types, which include small lot single-family detached homes, multi-family, townhouse and other attached dwellings, are set forth in Schedule A to the Litigation Settlement Agreement. 4. The full text of the proposed Litigation Settlement Agreement, including a map of the north and south lots, and all documents supporting the Settlement may be examined and copied during regular business hours at the Hampton Borough Clerk’s Office or may be obtained by written request to: Guliet D. Hirsch, Esquire Archer & Greiner, P.C. Countryside Plaza North 361 Route 31, Building E Suite 1301 Flemington, NJ 08822-1722 5. (a) Any interested party, including any low or moderate income person residing in northern New Jersey, any organization representing the interests of low or moderate income persons, any owner of property in Hampton Borough and any organization representing the interests of owners of property in Hampton Borough may file objections to the proposed Litigation Settlement Agreement and may present evidence in support of such objections. Objections must be filed in writing together with copies of any supporting affidavits or documents no later than May 22,2015 with the Honorable Peter A. Buchsbaum, Hunterdon County Justice Center, 65 Park Avenue, Flemington, New Jersey 08822. Copies must simultaneously be filed with the Hunterdon County Clerk, Hunterdon County Justice Center, 65 Park Avenue, Flemington, New Jersey 08822, with Guliet D. Hirsch at the address listed above and with the Hampton Borough Clerk, Cathy Drummond, at the Hampton Borough Municipal Building, 1 Wells Avenue, P.O. Box 418, Hampton, N.J. 08827. (b) Any party wishing to do so, may attend the hearing scheduled for May 29, 2015 beginning at 10 a.m. and ask questions, make objections or comments or provide testimony with respect to the proposed Mount Laurel Settlement Agreement. 6. This notice is provided by Order of the Law Division of the Superior Court. It is intended to inform all interested parties of the existence of the proposed Litigation Settlement Agreement and the possible consequences of Court approval of this settlement. It does not indicate any view by the Court as to the merits of the lawsuit or the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the proposed settlement and does not indicate that the Court will approve the settlement or enter a Judgment of Compliance. ($104.72)

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

City of Plainfield to Facilitate Redevelopment of Elmwood Gardens

Posted in: Area in Need of Redevelopment, Counties, Somerset by | No Comments Monday, April 20, 2015

Public Notice:


CORPORATION NOTICE CITY OF PLAINFIELD NOTICE OF FIRST READING \ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE HAS BEEN INTRODUCED AND PASSED ON FIRST READING AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD ON APRIL 13, 2015. MC 2015-14 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ELMWOOD GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BLOCK 235, LOT 10 PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING LAW, N.J.S.A. 40A:12 A-1 ET. SEQ. DESCRIPTION/IMPACT: THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IS EXPECTED TO FACILITATE THE REDEVELOPMENT OF ELMWOOD GARDENS FOR MULTI-FAMILY, AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS WITH INDIVIDUAL ENTRIES FOR EACH UNIT, AND TO PROVIDE NEW JOB AND HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE COMMUNITY. SAID ORDINANCE WILL BE TAKEN UP FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION FOR FINAL PASSAGE AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD AT THE MUNICIPAL COURT-COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 325 WATCHUNG AVENUE, PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY ON MAY 11, 2015, AT 8:00 P.M., AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS WHO MAY BE INTERESTED WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD CONCERNING THE SAME. A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE CAN BE OBTAINED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK WITHOUT COST TO ANY RESIDENT. ABUBAKAR JALLOH, RMC MUNICIPAL CLERK DATED: PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY APRIL 16, 2015. ($28.16)
Tagged , , , , , , , ,

City of Northfield Approves 19 Single Family Subdivision

Posted in: Atlantic County, Counties, Single Family Lots, Site Plan - Subdivision by | No Comments Friday, April 17, 2015

Public Notice:

NOTICE OF DECISION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that at the conclusion of a hearing held before it on March 12, 2015, the Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of Northfield granted preliminary major subdivision approval to the undersigned,
to allow the undersigned applicant to subdivide the subject property into 19 single-family residential building lots. The property, which is the subject of this Application, is shown and designated as Lots 25, 28, 29, 33 and 34 in Block 92 on the City of Northfield tax map, which property is located at 1823 Wabash Avenue in Northfield, New Jersey.
The property was formerly used as an industrial/construction yard and offices for Arthur R. Henry, Inc., a building contractor.

The decision of the Board was memorialized in a written Resolution adopted by the said City of Northfield Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment on April 2, 2015, and is available at the office of the Secretary to the City of Northfield Planning/Zoning Board of Adjustment at City Hall, 1600 Shore Road, Northfield, New Jersey.

NEHMAD PERILLO & DAVIS, P.C.
By:
STEPHEN R. NEHMAD, ESQUIRE
Attorney for Applicant Mason Properties LLC
4030 Ocean Heights Avenue
Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234
(609) 927-1177
DATED:
April 15, 2015
Printer Fee: $23.46
#0090898690
Pub Date: April 15, 2015.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Mount Arlington Wants to Develop Redevelopment Plan for Landfill

Posted in: Area in Need of Redevelopment, Counties, Morris County NJ by | No Comments Thursday, April 16, 2015

Public Notice:


BOROUGH OF MOUNT ARLINGTON #03-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNT ARLINGTON, COUNTY OF MORRIS AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNT ARLINGTON’S SANITARY LANDFILL WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council for the Borough of Mount Arlington desires to continue to compile information and develop a plan for a redevelopment project at the Borough of Mount Arlington’s sanitary landfill; and WHEREAS, previously a reserve of $100,000 was set aside in the General Capital Fund to fund the landfill closure when the Borough decided to proceed with the project, a copy of the “Borough of Mount Arlington Notes to Financial Statements Year Ended December 31, 2013”; and the “Post Closing Trial Balance General Capital Fund as of December 31, 2014”, is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth at length; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council for the Borough of Mount Arlington intends to actively compile information and develop a plan for a redevelopment project at the Borough of Mount Arlington’s sanitary landfill; and on February 3, 2015 adopted Resolution No.: 2015-37A, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth at length, authorizing the Borough to solicit proposals for the implementation of a solar photovoltaic (PV) redevelopment project located at the Borough of Mount Arlington sanitary landfill; and WHEREAS, in order to finance the expenditures associated with the redevelopment project at the Borough of Mount Arlington’s sanitary landfill, including but not limited to, all activities associated with closure costs; the design and implementation of all necessary measures; feasibility study of the implementation of a photovoltaic (PV) system; and Request for Proposals for the implementation of a PV redevelopment; the General Capital Fund Reserve must be formally appropriated; and WHEREAS, the Borough Auditor and the Borough CFO recommends the Mayor and Council for the Borough of Mount Arlington authorize the appropriation. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Mount Arlington, County of Morris and State of New Jersey as follows: SECTION 1. The improvement and purpose described in Section 3 of the ordinance is hereby authorized as a general improvement to be made or acquired by the Borough of Mount Arlington. SECTION 2. For the financing said improvements there is hereby appropriated the following amounts: GENERAL CAPITAL FUND RESERVE FOR LANDFILL $100,000. SECTION 3. The improvement authorized is expenditures associated with the redevelopment project at the Borough of Mount Arlington’s sanitary landfill, including but not limited to, all activities associated with closure costs; the design and implementation of all necessary measures; feasibility study of the implementation of a photovoltaic (PV) system; and Request for Proposals for the implementation of a PV redevelopment project. SECTION 4. The improvement described in Section 3 of this ordinance is not a current expense; and is an improvement, which the Borough is lawfully permitted to make or acquire as a general improvement. SECTION 5. Included in the total cost is the sum of $100,000 for expenses permitted pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:2-20. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect after final adoption and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 7. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed as to such inconsistencies. SECTION 8. If any article, section, subsection, paragraph, phrase, or sentence is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, said article, section, subsection, paragraph, phrase or sentence shall be deemed separable. I HEREBY CERTIFY this to be a true and correct Ordinance of the Mayor and Borough Council of the Borough of Mount Arlington, adopted on April 7, 2015 and will be further considered after a Public Hearing held on May 5, 2015 at the Municipal Building at 10:00 A.M. INTRODUCED: PUBLISHED: BOROUGH OF MOUNT ALRINGTON ATTEST: COUNTY OF MORRIS STATE OF NEW JERSEY Linda DeSantis, Borough Clerk Arthur Ondish, Mayor ($71.28)
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cherry Hill Looks at Redevelopment of Hampton Road

Posted in: Area in Need of Redevelopment, Camden County NJ, Counties by | No Comments Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Public Notice:


TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF DECISIONS ___________________________ TAKE NOTICE that on the 6th day of April, 2015, the Planning Board of the Township of Cherry Hill in Camden County, NJ memorialized the following resolutions: Application #14-P-0037 (FC Cherry Hill, LLC & NM Cherry Hill, LLC). The Applicant has submitted an application for preliminary and final major site plan approval with bulk (c) variances to develop and extend an access driveway from the rear of Lot 5 (former Syms Clothing store) through Cardone Avenue (a private access right of way) to Marlkress Road (a County Road) for the property located at Block 437.01, Lots 3-9 and 21 on the tax maps of the Township of Cherry Hill. There are no variances requested or required with this application as the Applicant has provided appropriate evidence that they will comply with all required residential buffer requirements consistent with Ordinance Section 508.F. The applicant requested the Planning Board to recognize two existing nonconforming conditions, one related to number of parking space and one related to right of way parking setback, neither of which is affected by this application. Resolution 2015-4-1: On April 6, 2015, the Cherry Hill Planning Board reviewed and considered proposed amendments to various Articles of the Zoning Ordinance. Whereas, after a public hearing held on April 6, 2015, the following findings of facts were made, to wit and recommended to council for approval: a. Ordinance 2013-18, as amended, known as the Cherry Hill Township Zoning Ordinance, includes revisions to Article IX Fees, Guarantees, Inspections & Off-Tract Improvements, specifically Section 901.A, to amend various fees for the submission of planning and zoning board applications and the inclusion of Administrative Agent fees for the administration of affordable housing. b. Ordinance 2013-18, as amended, known as the Cherry Hill Township Zoning Ordinance, includes revisions to Article X Affordable Housing Procedural & Eligibility Requirements, specifically Section 1005.1.a and 2.a, to provide further clarification that the inclusionary standards for for-sale and rental housing shall apply to developments approved via a use (D) variance application per N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d). Resolution 2015-4-2: The Cherry Hill Township Council directed the Planning Board by resolution (Resolution No. 2014-11-7), dated November 24, 2014, to undertake a preliminary investigation known as Block 111.02, Lot 7; Block 112.01 Lot 11; and Block 596.04, Lots 4 and 5ation to determine if the area known as the “Hampton Road Study Area,” known as Block 431.18, Lot 8, on the Township’s Tax Map (“the Property”), satisfies the criteria for designation as an area in need of redevelopment, and as a “Condemnation Redevelopment Area” pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (“LRHL”), N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1, et. seq. The Planning Board prepared a map of the study area and undertook a preliminary investigation in accordance with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-6 to determine whether the Property qualifies as an area in need of redevelopment as provided under the LRHL, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5. The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on April 6, 2015, where the Planning Board, among other things, provided an opportunity to hear all persons who were interested in or would be affected by the determination that the delineated area is a redevelopment area. At the public hearing the Planning Board reviewed the findings of the Preliminary Investigation Study for the Property (“the Study”) prepared by Robert Melvin, PP, AICP of GroupMelvinDesign, dated March 26, 2015, heard expert testimony from Mr. Melvin and received public comment. The Planning Board by a unanimous vote of its members concluded: a. The Planning Board hereby recommends that the Governing Body determine that Block 111.02, Lot 7; Block 112.01, Lot 11; and Block 596.04, Lot 5 be designated as an area in need of redevelopment and as a “Condemnation Redevelopment Area,” as defined under the Redevelopment Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 et seq. b. The investigation of the Redevelopment Study Area reveals that the statutory criteria under sections B, C, and D of N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5 have been met for the areas known as Block 111.02, Lot 7; Block 112.01, Lot 11; and Block 596.04, Lot 5, as proposed to be designated for redevelopment as clearly set forth in the Melvin Report dated March 26, 2015. c. The Planning Board hereby recommends that the Governing Body determine that Block 596.04, Lot 4 not be designated as an area in need of redevelopment as defined under the Redevelopment Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 et seq. In support of these recommendations the Planning Board incorporates by reference and adopts the findings and conclusions of the Melvin Report, and the evidence contained in the record, and for the reasons set forth in the record. This resolution of the Planning Board of the Township of Cherry Hill shall take effect immediately. ($89.55)
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

South Brunswick To Hear 7 Lot Subdivision

Posted in: Counties, Middlesex County NJ, Single Family Lots, Site Plan - Subdivision by | No Comments Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Public Notice:


TOWNSHIP SOUTH BRUNSWICK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a public hearing will be held at 7:30 p.m. on Thursday, April 23, 2015 at a regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment of the Township of South Brunswick, Municipal Building, 540 Ridge Road, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey 08852. The subject of the hearing will be 133 Old Beekman Road, LLC, File No. 13-062, application for Use Variance and Preliminary and Final Major Subdivision to create nine (9) new lots on the property (seven (7) building lots, one (1) detention basin lot and one (1) open space lot). Variances will be required from Township of South Brunswick as follows: Minimum Lot Area – where 43,560 square feet is required and 30,066 square feet is proposed for Lot 26.16, 40,039 square feet is proposed for Lot 26.17. Minimum Lot Width – where 150 square feet is required and 126.75 feet is proposed for Lot 26.16, 50 feet is proposed for Lot 26.17, 81.03 feet is proposed for Lot 26.18, 109.21 feet is proposed for Lot 26.19, 119.72 feet is proposed for Lot 26.20, 98.47 feet is proposed for Lot 26.21. Minimum Lot Depth – where 200 feet is required and 193 feet is proposed for Lot 26.16. Minimum Front Yard Setback – where 50 feet is required and 30 feet is proposed for Lots 26.16, 26.18, 26.19, 26.20, 26.21 and 26.22. Minimum Side Yard Setback – where 20 feet is required and 15 feet is proposed for Lots 26.16, 26.17, 26.18, 26.19, 26.20, 26.21 and 26.22. Minimum Rear Yard Setback – where 50 feet is required and 35 feet is proposed for Lots 26.16 and 30 feet is proposed for Lots 26.17 and 26.22. Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) – where 0.12 is required and 0.18 is proposed for Lot 26.16 and 0.13 is proposed for Lots 26.18, 26.19, 26.20, 26.21 and 26.22. Applicant seeks any other waivers or variances that the Board of Adjustment may find necessary at that time, although none other than the above are contemplated at the present time. This plan is for the site known as Block 93.12, Lot 26.15 located at 133 Old Beekman Road, Monmouth Junction, NJ which is located in the R-1 Zoning District. A copy of the maps and documents for which approval is sought is on file in the office of the above Board for public inspection during regular business hours (8:30 AM 4:30 PM) Monday through Friday, except holidays. c/o Peter U. Lanfrit, Esq. The Law Office of 3000 Hadley Road, Suite 1C South Plainfield, NJ 07080 ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT Kindly provide me with an Affidavit of Publication as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation herein. Very truly yours, Peter U. Lanfrit ($44.44)
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Washington Township Planning Board to Hear 138 Market Value Town House Application

Posted in: Counties, Gloucester County NJ, Site Plan - Subdivision, Town Houses by | No Comments Monday, April 13, 2015

Public Notice:

PUBLIC NOTICE Washington Township Planning Board NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TAKE NOTICE that the Washington Township Planning Board will conduct a public hearing on April 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM in the Municipal Building, 523 Egg Harbor Road, Sewell, NJ to consider an application by 530 Delsea Drive, LLC, for Preliminary and Final Major Subdivision Approval, to create 142 lots, including 138 market rate townhome lots, 2 open space lots, one roadway lot, and one commercial lot. The project will be constructed in 3 phases, Phase I including 79 townhomes, 2 open space lots, and a roadway lot; Phase II including 59 townhomes and a tot lot; and Phase III including a commercial component. The site is located on Delsea Drive, south of its intersection with Hurffville-Grenloch Road, is + 18 acres and is located within Node 6 of the Delsea Drive Redevelopment Area. The Applicant proposes a subdivision to include a 1.12 acre parcel for commercial development on a portion of Lot 2, Block 48 with frontage along the Delsea Drive. The remainder 16.8 acres includes a proposed 138 unit market rate townhouse development, with 2 open space lots and a roadway lot. The proposed development will result in the extension of public sewer along Delsea Drive. Public water will tie into Hurffville-Grenloch Road. The proposed townhouse units and commercial component are permitted uses within Node 6 of the Delsea Drive Redevelopment Plan. Variance relief is requested from Section 285-196.A, where max allowed parking is 105% of the required parking, Section 285-201.A(2), to allow stormwater basins within the landscaping buffer where no stormwater facilities are permitted, and Section 283-196.G, to allow parking spaces of 9′ x 18′. A waiver from Section 220-21B(6) of the Washington Township Code to allow off-street parking in front of the principle structure is requested. In the event the Planning Board or its professionals determine that variance relief or additional waiver relief is required, the applicant does request such relief. You are advised of said hearing because you are the owner(s) of property located within 200 feet of the proposed project and are required to be notified according to the requirements of the M.L.U.L. 1975. You are not required to attend this meeting unless you wish to object to the desired action by the applicant. The application, plans, and supporting documentation are available for examination during normal business hours at the Office of the Planning Board. Cost $75.40 (3913829) 4/10/ 2015
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

North Brunswick to Add Professional Building

Posted in: Commerical, Counties, Middlesex County NJ, Site Plan - Subdivision by | No Comments Saturday, April 11, 2015

Public Notice:


TOWNSHIP NORTH BRUNSWICK NORTH BRUNSWICK PLANNING BOARD PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 7, 2015 the Township of North Brunswick Planning Board adopted a Resolution memorializing its approval of the application of Dr. Araceli Ziemba for preliminary and final major site plan approval with variances to remove an existing building and to construct a new 2 story building with basement for professional office use on the property designated as Block 221, Lot 24 on the current Tax and Assessment Map of North Brunswick Township, located at 1861 Route 130, North Brunswick Township, New Jersey and situated in the G-O General Office Zone District. A copy of the Resolution of Memorialization is on file with the Office of the Planning Board located at the Municipal Building, 710 Hermann Road, North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902 and is available for inspection during regular business hours. Dr. Araceli Ziemba By: Frizell and Samuels, Esqs. Attorneys for Applicant 450 Main Street Metuchen, NJ 08840 ($18.04)
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

West Windsor Grants Artis Senior Livning Approvals for Alzheimers Facility

Posted in: age-restricted, Congregate Care Facility, Counties, Mercer County NJ, Site Plan - Subdivision, special needs by | No Comments Friday, April 10, 2015

Public Notice:
NOTICE OF DECISION
TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BLOCK 6, LOT 64, ALEXANDER ROAD
ARTIS SENIOR LIVING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 2, 2015, the Township of West Windsor Zoning Board of Adjustment (“Zoning Board”) adopted a Resolution granting ARTIS SENIOR LIVING (the “Applicant”) Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan approval for the development of an approximately 35,745 s.f. 64-bed Alzheimers and dementia memory care facility at property located at 861 Alexander Road and designated as Block 6, Lot 64, as shown on the Official Tax Map of the Township of West Windsor (the “Property”).

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the public may review the Resolution at the office of the Division of Land Use, West Windsor Township Municipal Building at 271 Clarksville Road, West Windsor, New Jersey Monday through Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
April 3, 2015

Henry L Kent-Smith, Esq.
Fox Rothschild, LP
997 Lenox Drive / Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
609-896-4584
Attorney for Applicant

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lakewood Planning Board Approves Airport Road Site

Posted in: Counties, Industrial, Ocean County NJ, Site Plan - Subdivision by | No Comments Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Public Notice:


TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD Notice of Decision by the Lakewood Township Planning Board On March 17, 2015, the Lakewood Township Planning Board adopted a Resolution memorializing the approval granted to the applicant, Legacy Lakewood, LLC, SP# 2100 for an Application for Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Approval with design waivers for the following relief for property located at Block 1160.01, Lot 221, and known as 999 Airport Road, located within the M-1 (Industrial) Zone, Lakewood Township: The applicant was granted approval for the construction of an eight thousand square foot prefabricated garage on the existing pavement and to convert an existing gravel area of approximately two thousand four hundred square feet (2,400 sf) to pavement for additional parking. The applicant was granted various design waivers for installation of sidewalks and curbs, planting of street and shade trees, and providing paved parking spaces. The Resolution approving the application along with all plans and related documents are on file at the Lakewood Township Planning Board office located at 231 Third Street, Lakewood, New Jersey during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. Attorney for the Applicant Robert C. Shea, Esquire R.C. Shea & Associates Toms River, New Jersey ($37.50)
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,